首页> 外文OA文献 >“Shared learning” for building urban climate resilience – experiences from Asian cities
【2h】

“Shared learning” for building urban climate resilience – experiences from Asian cities

机译:建立城市气候适应力的“共享学习” –亚洲城市的经验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper considers how resilience thinking and, in particular, its emphasis on learning has been applied in 10 cities in Vietnam, India, Thailand and Indonesia. Applying a “shared learning” approach in the Asian Cities Climate Change Resilience Network (ACCCRN) has helped to create or strengthen networks, build appreciation for complexity and uncertainty among stakeholders, provide a space for deliberating concepts such as vulnerability and resilience, and build knowledge and capacities for stakeholders to engage and represent their own interests. Shared learning approaches face considerable challenges navigating politicized urban environments, in which the nature and value of existing systems − and therefore the value of building resilience − are contested. This article suggests that deliberate, strategic intervention by facilitators may contribute to more transformative change on behalf of equitable, socially just outcomes – and thus cautions against seeing urban climate vulnerability as a technical challenge, or shared learning as a “toolkit” for building resilience.
机译:本文考虑了如何在越南,印度,泰国和印度尼西亚的10个城市中应用弹性思维,尤其是其对学习的重视。在亚洲城市气候变化抗御力网络(ACCCRN)中采用“共享学习”方法有助于建立或加强网络,对利益相关者之间的复杂性和不确定性表示赞赏,为讨论诸如脆弱性和抗灾力等概念提供了空间利益相关者参与并代表自己利益的能力。共享的学习方法在政治化的城市环境中面临着巨大的挑战,在这种环境中,现有系统的性质和价值-以及建筑弹性的价值-受到了挑战。本文建议,主持人的蓄意战略干预可能代表公平,社会公正的成果促进更具变革性的变化–因此,请注意不要将城市气候脆弱性视为技术挑战,也不应将共享学习视为增强抵御力的“工具”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号